Bausch + Lomb ULTRA vs PureVision2
A neutral comparison of two Bausch + Lomb monthly silicone hydrogel families using verified India specifications.
| Feature | ULTRA | PureVision2 |
|---|---|---|
| Material | samfilcon A | balafilcon A |
| Water content | 46% | 36% |
| Replacement | 30 days or prescribed | 30 days or prescribed |
| Manufacturer focus | MoistureSeal; screen-use positioning | High Definition Optics; ComfortMoist packaging |
| Astigmatism option | ULTRA for Astigmatism | PureVision2 for Astigmatism |
| Presbyopia option | ULTRA for Presbyopia | PureVision2 for Presbyopia |
What do the material differences mean?
samfilcon A and balafilcon A are different silicone hydrogel materials. Water content is not a standalone comfort score, and oxygen performance is not the only fitting criterion. Surface properties, edge design, movement and tear-film interaction can change the wearing experience.
Which family is better for digital-device users?
Bausch + Lomb explicitly positions ULTRA around MoistureSeal and reduced blinking during screen use. PureVision2 emphasises High Definition Optics and thin-lens design. Marketing position can guide what to discuss, but it does not predict which lens will fit your eye better.
Related guides
Read ULTRA, PureVision2 HD and our existing ULTRA vs AIR OPTIX comparison.
FAQs
Are ULTRA and PureVision2 both monthly?
Yes, when prescribed on their current 30-day replacement schedules.
Can I switch between them using the same power?
Not automatically. Material, fit and lens design differ, so a professional trial is recommended.
Need help choosing between contact lenses?
A comparison page can explain verified differences, but the final lens choice should be based on a current prescription, professional fitting and how the lens performs on your eyes.
Find a store near youContact Lens Guides